Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 6,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 4:45 am
New trialR. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:45 am
It dealt with search and seizure of electronic devices at border crossings. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:51 am
Our experience includes advising clients in Toronto, Canada and the United States on the application of Canadian competition and regulatory laws and we have worked on hundreds of domestic and cross-border competition, advertising and marketing, promotional contest (sweepstakes), conspiracy (cartel), abuse of dominance, compliance, refusal to deal and pricing and distribution matters. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 3:25 am
Lex & Forum renews its scientific appointment with its readers for the next (eighth) issue, focusing on family disputes of a cross-border nature. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:53 am
Under the classic 1955 tort case Garratt v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:51 pm
That came out clearly in the argument on Abramski v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:06 pm
”The case cite is Commission v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:02 am
., an 19 year old who had sex with a 17 year old).With its the recent decision in Estrada-Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:21 pm
"The road to change will be difficult, however.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(vii) how does cross-border collaboration impact on innovation? [read post]
24 May 2022, 3:08 pm
"] From Del Nero v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
On appeal, the General Court (“GC”), in line with both lower instances, confirmed the descriptiveness of “Sophienwald” as a geographical indication (Ruling of 3 July 2024, T-597/22 – Sophienwald v EUIPO – Zalto Glas [Sw Sophienwald]). [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:06 am
National Pork Producers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
Customs and Border Protection to apply the rebuttable presumption unless the importer can overcome the presumption of forced labor by establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the good, ware, article, or merchandise was not mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part by forced labor. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:33 am
The case of Movsesian v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:23 am
The appeals court decision (Popolizio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
--Public comment. -- Committee discussion. 10) RCW 42.56.330 (8) -- Personally identifying information on an ID card that contains a chip to facilitate border crossing. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
