Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 48,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
" Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH, et. al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:01 pm
(Gattuso v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
City of Miami and Wells Fargo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
On 30 Oct 2017, Independent Print and the Evening Standard applied to the Supreme Court for permission, which was granted on the condition that they provide security for costs in the sum of £85,000 and that they would not be allowed to seek the costs of the appeal. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:24 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:11 am
The setting off of costs against costs is a form of enforcement covered by the QOCS provisions just as the setting off of costs against damages is. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada released a decision this week in Hryniak v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
” (OI, v.1, 228) (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:12 am
Justice Johnston went on to quote from the decision in Dunford v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
Tackett et al, that may permit M&G Polymers USA, a chemical company, to force its retirees to help pay for the cost of retiree medical coverage. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
Tackett et al, that may permit M&G Polymers USA, a chemical company, to force its retirees to help pay for the cost of retiree medical coverage. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
The SEC failed to even attempt to quantify these costs, even though historical data on the costs of proxy contests is available. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:02 am
Cites to Airbnb v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:50 am
Consider, for example, the allegations in Edwards v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
"The ordinance’s stated purpose is to overcome the detrimental affects of neighborhood blight and reduce enforcement costs associated with the blight. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
Walsh-Stender v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:10 am
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: (Case C-112/11); [2012] WLR (D) 217 “The concept of ’optional price supplements’, referred to in the last sentence of article 23(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community, covered costs… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
Quesinberry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm
Nor can the award of costs be presumed simply because a party was successful on a threshold ground and the costs were incurred. [read post]
