Search for: "DOE Corporations 1-20" Results 4861 - 4880 of 5,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 10:35 pm
That is why the provision in Art. 32 Rome  II-Reg. does not amount to a specification of the date of entry into force under Art. 254 para. 1 EC and the Rome  II-Regulation consequently entered into force on the twentieth day following the day of its publication. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:46 pm
The HC would have the right to defer making even the interest payments for five years or 20 consecutive quarters. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Experts estimate that at least 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 10 boys will be sexually victimized in some way before they reach adulthood, and just 1 in 3 will tell anybody about it. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:34 am
" Does Chinese law allow for piercing the corporate veil to go after owners for fraud in these circumstances? [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:26 am
Taxing the drug $50 an ounce, it said, would generate more than $1 billion annually for a cash-strapped state that closed a $42 billion budget deficit last month. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
While there are many reasons for these breathtaking declines, surely a proximate cause was the sky-high assets to equity ratios of many of these institutions. 20 to 1, 35 to 1, and even 50 to 1 were not unheard of in the palmy days. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:20 am
The suit doesn’t name defendants, except to call them “John Does 1 to 100″ and “ABC Corporations 1 to 5,” according to this story in the Daily Press. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
In a previous Client Alert, [1] we discussed a decision of the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissing a stockholder suit that alleged breach of fiduciary duty by directors who initiated, but later abandoned, a sale process that had generated three attractive offers. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:42 am
Senator Dodd's Letter to the SEC - Intent to Make Say on Pay Immediately Effective On February 20, 2009, Senator Christopher Dodd, the author of the executive compensation restrictions in the stimulus bill, issued a letter to Chairman Schapiro. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
The repeal would raise $7 Billion over 10 years.Temporary Reduction in Recognition Period for S Corporation Built-In Gains Tax.According to IRC Section 1374, the highest marginal rate applicable to corporations (currently 35%) is imposed on the gain of an S Corporation that converted from a C Corporation, for gain that arose prior to the conversion. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
The Institute does the legwork for the Fortune 100 list. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
  Wilson does not say how much “use” would be needed to prevent loss. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
  Registration does not imply endorsement. [read post]