Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
Unlike Admiral Lord Nelson - he has two of them: "Britishness does not normally involve snitching or talking about someone. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Effective date of transfer is defined in section 6(i)(1) of RESPA (12 U.S.C. 2605(i)(1)). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm
A mechanism to ensure that double taxation does not occur would need to be agreed to, but the coordination of new taxing rights vs. old taxing rights will be complicated. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:50 am
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:41 pm
You may have to immobilize the neck until the clearing x-rays can be done. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:45 pm
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:31 am
For example, we might use a temporal baseline to define harm: action X is a harm to individual P if and only if P is worse off after X and this change in welfare is causally produced by X. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:15 am
PAC consider a contribution for candidate X is a violation of the law. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 7:48 pm
The Fund, however, will be established X years after the entry into force of the Legally Binding Instruments. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
The AmeriKat could entertain (or perhaps bore) some of you with details of their view, but it does not make for a very interesting read because they essentially agreed with Floyd J’s reasoning and upheld him on every point.What was interesting was the point on non-designation of the '908 patent. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
(The opinion does not say what statutes the charges were brought under, but I assume the computer crime charge was brought under Kansas Statutes §21-3755(b)(1) and the theft charge was brought under Kansas Statutes §21-3701.) [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:13 am
I am in a state of retirement I think you say here… but I keep my hand in with the money laundering and the odd exorcism. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
Unfortunately, the insurance company does not see things the same way. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:38 pm
Does that sound correct? [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Even if it does lead to new business, it’s a lot of work. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:00 pm
I represent that my performance of all the terms of this Agreement does not and will not breach any agreement I have entered into, or will enter into with any third party, including without limitation any agreement to keep in confidence proprietary information acquired by me in confidence or in trust prior to commencement of my Relationship with the Company. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
REVKIN (x-post from Dot Earth 6:35 p.m. | Updated Last weekend, I took my two sons, 13 and 21, to see “Rise of the Planet of the Apes,” which we thoroughly enjoyed on several levels. [read post]
