Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 4881 - 4900 of 27,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 8:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
It does not resolve questions about the Establishment Clause, but as I explained in March, this provision does not apply in the immigration context; in the nine months since I laid out this argument, no one has responded to it. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
There will be rich always: finding a new way to think about income inequality, Freakonomics, Dec. 20, 2011. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
July 28, 2014) — offered three main arguments for its position, but I don’t think they are on balance persuasive: 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Georgia (July 31 – August 1) Exemptions apply to purchases of school supplies, clothing (up to $100 per item but does not include clothing accessories such as jewelry, handbags, umbrellas, eyewear, watches, and watchbands), computers and related accessories ($1,000 or less per item) and school supplies ($20 or less per item). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
Die Grosse Beschwerdekammer (GBK) hat in der Entscheidung G 1/12 (ABl. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
Key findings of the study include: 1) parole denial upon initial eligibility does very little to reduce crime rates, 2) people convicted of homicide and sex offenses rarely commit new crimes, and 3) increased time served does not increase the likelihood of success upon release.To view full copy of the report click here. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm by Rick Hasen
  Here is an interesting snippet from the reply brief: 1. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:55 am
Indeed (great word, a bit pompous but draws you in) the starting position in distribution of capital is a 50/50 split unless there are compelling reasons for departure such as:1. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:58 am by Tracy Coenen
In particular it does not reveal how much of the income of the top 1% is derived from retail sales they themselves made and how much is merely “overrides” on the purchases and sales of the “downline. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:25 pm by Chris Earley
  Or, if the case does not settle, or loses at trial, the attorney takes nothing. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
The method by which the result is revealed does not affect the outcome of the sweepstakes. [read post]