Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 4881 - 4900 of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:00 am by Evangelina Cantu
”[v] Crocs moved for summary judgment on grounds that Dawgs’ counterclaim failed to state a cause of action under Section 43(a)(1)(B) based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:58 am by Eric
I know some other states have enacted domain name protection laws (California comes to mind), but it's not clear what benefits these state laws have. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm by Venkat
Unfair Competition Law: Finally, the court also finds that plaintiffs adequately state a claim under California's unfair competition statute. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Her friendly advice on how to be a good appellate court: (1) Do not ignore controlling Supreme Court decisions (see U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
This case provides a good example for agencies of the information that should be included in the CEQA document when the mitigation involves adherence to state codes and local regulations. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Cases that are only on their second relist still have a very good chance of eventually being granted outright. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:28 am by David Oscar Markus
"And in a recent case dealing with a California law regulating the sale or rental of violent video games to children, Justice Anthony Kennedy pressed a skeptical state lawyer on whether the v-chip blocking device, rather than a state law, could be used to keep children away from the games. [read post]