Search for: "Harding v. State"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 15,884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
As to the confusion and misidentification stated in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, in addition to the examples provided by Article 4(1) of the SPC Interpretation, i.e. the misunderstanding in terms of having commercial affiliation or licensing relation, the court also added examples of ‘commercial titling and advertising endorsement’. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
They already held those seats, there was no election for them, and state and city law said that vacancies (if any) would be held by the incumbants until a successor was elected.Viewed in that light, it's hard to see why the failure to run for these three seats should somehow be held against the three.That still leaves Justice Sanchez's (very good) point that you shouldn't be allowed to hold on to your two-year seat by the mere expedient of cancelling the… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:48 pm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:55 am
Gloria Gregory, a NOMS employee, stated that she transcribed Dr. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Mendenhall v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am
That language originally appeared in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
While your phone’s capabilities are distinctly modern, a new decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:58 pm
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:38 pm
It's hard to like the result in Wake County v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
In many cases that has been very hard to determine, he added. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:49 am
Credit Union v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm
Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v B- where delay was used to refuse to return a child to Australia, because he was well settled in South Africa.Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v Ashmore- where delay was again used to refuse to return a child to Australia. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:35 pm
’” People v Gioglio, 296 Mich App 12 (2012), quoting Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 688, 694; 104 St Ct 2052; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
The question is whether states are required to allow gun shows on their property. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm
It’s hard to keep track of terms that are only relevant in an Illinois divorce…while you’re in the middle of an Illinois divorce. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:33 am
Paragraphs [793] and [794] state: "The relevant patents have been found valid and infringed. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
See McNellis v. [read post]
