Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 4881 - 4900
of 27,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 9:48 am
He loses.The case is Rosu v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
By way of introduction, Lord Brown noted that the majority in the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ [2008] 1 AC 385 held that deprivation of liberty might take a variety of forms other than classic detention in prison or strict arrest. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:20 am
Neighboring state Minnesota held in Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
West VirginiaDocket: 11-224Issue(s): Whether, when a state attorney general claims parens patriae authority and sues out-of-state defendants on behalf of private individuals under a state statute which requires that any recovery go to those individuals rather than the state, the defendants may remove the case as a “class action” under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:02 pm
Likewise, in Henry v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
In G v UK [2011] ECHR 1308, Strasbourg held that his complaint was inadmissible. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
NUI Cork T/A Cork University Press [2000] IEHC 70 and Sweeney v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
State, 469 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 (Indiana Supreme Court 1984) (referencing Nixon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:14 am
For a United States Department of Labor Fact Sheet on “Tipped Employees Under the Fair Labor Standards Act,” click U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2006, 1:21 am
Bob Kuchar won in State v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:32 am
In Zemeckis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:22 am
The common law duty of disclosure is based on fairness but fairness does not require the same level of disclosure at every stage of the process. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
This aims to achieve fairness and the efficient resolution of disputes. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The 1994 Campbell v. [read post]
