Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 4881 - 4900 of 19,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
And although the state post-conviction court, seeing the case as a “mockery of [its] promise to people who are in the criminal justice system that they will have an adequate defense,” initially granted Rudin relief, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed that court’s judgment, finding Rudin’s petition untimely and reinstating her criminal convictions. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 8:38 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The appellant disclosed the outcome of a judgment of the Supreme Court to the public while it was still in draft and subject to embargo, knowing that such disclosure was prohibited. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:30 pm
  In this post, I want to consider a point that Justice Thomas made in his dissent from a recent Supreme Court decision, Graham v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
” In 1977, the Supreme Court ruled in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Media Reports of Family Courts Case and Family Justice Issues Local authority is granted permission by a top judge to forcibly vaccinate a seven-month-old baby boy against his mother’s wishes despite claims she has bad reactions to jabs in the past:  The Daily Mails ‘forced vaccination’ headline implies some excessive, inappropriate state interference with families. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
brief opinion rejecting misdemeanant's Second Amendment claim Still more proof that federal courts have no real interest in gun rights Has there been a single pro-gun-rights rulings in lower courts since Heller? [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: You note that the “Roberts Court is still a work in progress. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 9:13 pm
As suggested in new SCOTUS preview articles from Adam Liptak in the New York Times and Tony Mauro in Legal Times, there are no obvious blockbuster cases on the Supreme Court's docket as the Justice start their new Term this Monday. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Well, Broadway is still dark this week, and it seems the judges of the New York Court of Appeals don't want the courts of the Empire State to do much work either -- at least not the sort of work that entails thinking hard about whether litigants who put their medical status in issue need to consent -- under HIPAA -- to informal interviews of their treating physicians by opposing counsel, conducted under New York discovery rules.A tip of the hat to Eric Turkewitz, who… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:38 am by Erin Miller
” Yet Justice Sotomayor still wanted an example of a case – even a theoretical case – outside the mainstream. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Kal Golde covers the court’s answers to some frequently asked questions about the chief justice’s role for this blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
The justices have one oral argument on their agenda this morning, in Lomax v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am by INFORRM
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:17 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
He pointed to language in the Supreme Court’s 1908 decision in Winters v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
See a NY Times review of Dale Carpenter's new book "Flagrant Conduct," telling the story of Lawrence v. [read post]