Search for: "In re Harris"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 6,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The case is In re Tribune Co., 08-13141, U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Harris, 15-278, is back. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
Kamala Harris in California has certainly been shone to be cognizant and reactive to public opinion. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In re Chestnut Energy Partners, Inc., 300 S.W.3d 386, 397 (Tex. [read post]
15 May 2016, 9:30 pm
“Externalists” believe that FDR’s landslide re-election in 1936 or Court-packing plan of 1937 persuaded swing justices to vote for the New Deal. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
In Harris County, Tex. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:19 am
Harris Khor from Hush Puppies7. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 3:41 pm
Contributors to this series include Dan Kirkpatrick, Rob Schill, Don Evans and Harry Cole.] [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
Raymond Randolph, Harry Edwards, and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:19 am
Harris Khor from Hush Puppies7. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 4:00 pm
We’re in the last gasps of the old, and presumably white world – the old guard is dying, you see. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
The Fourteenth Amendment plays no role in the argument.Meanwhile, there's another--at least stylistic--objection to the notion that the President should "invoke" the Fourteenth Amendment, as though it were a kind of magic talisman: like Harry Potter summoning his Patronus or, equally fancifully and more ridiculously, Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy.Yes, there are some circumstances in which one must invoke a constitutional provision for it to operate. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
Whiteness as property, Cheryl Harris, is also relevant. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Not only do the California and Vermont constitutions offer greater privacy protections than the Fourth Amendment, the cases can’t be appealed to the federal Supreme Court if they’re decided purely on the basis of state law. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm
Speakers will provide a worldwide picture of the future of "The Metaverse as a Challenge to Classical IP”, including on re-imagining IP in this area in favour of both business and consumers/society. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
Alabama, which Huffman and [Harris County DA Mike] Anderson would prefer to ignore.)Right now, Texas law complies with Miller v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 12:58 pm
Oh, and if you're wondering, the book does have a copyright notice ... [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm
But you think you're an intellectual, don't you, ape? [read post]
