Search for: "In re Means"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 89,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2012, 8:37 am
Keeping information in multiple locations means that it isn’t always accurate or up-do-date when and where you need it. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
But that doesn't necessarily mean that the opinions are unimportant, or unworthy of correction. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:16 am
Here at the CBA Legal Futures Initiative, we’ve sought to demonstrate to the Canadian legal profession that great opportunities await those who embrace change; opportunities to put clients at the centre of our work, to better serve Canadians, to provide new kinds of services, to open up new models of legal service delivery, to work in conjunction with others, and most importantly, to creatively re-imagine what it means to “be a lawyer” in the future. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 12:41 pm
This does not mean a person has to be rich or spend lots of money. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 1:42 pm
(What, you mean they aren't?) [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 12:35 pm
I don't necessarily mean this to be tongue-in-cheek. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:43 am
The appellate court's majority also ignored District Judge Gettleman's determination below that under the law, a "teacher is compelled to instruct her pupils, especially in the lower grades, about prayer and its meaning... [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
And due to a host of expansions to various worker-protections laws (such as the Americans with Disabilities Act), lawyers and their clients may have more rights and more means to redress grievances. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:35 am
This means furthermore that "no presumptive truthfulness attaches to plaintiff's allegations," and the Court will determine for itself if the plaintiff has satisfied a jurisdictional claim. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In turn, that can mean a higher risk of collision and injury. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:58 pm
That’s okay means she wants to think long and hard before deciding how and when you will pay for your mistake. 7) Thanks A woman is thanking you, do not question, or faint, Just say you’re welcome. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
They don’t improve reputation so much as marginalize on it—you’re no longer relying on past encounters. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 8:30 am
I hope to get back to posting more regularly now that we’re in an “off year” (whatever that means), but in the meantime, this blog turned five on October 24. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
And though Issa is seemingly loath to give up the fight to indict her for contempt that means offering Lerner immunity. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:29 pm
We’re very thankful to have the opportunity to represent so many fine people. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:36 am
Storekeepers occasionally hose things down in specious attempts to disperse the suspicious-looking liquids, meaning the floor never dries. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:58 am
In re Ricoh Co., Ltd. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:16 am
The short answer is that it depends what you mean by "licensed content. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm
These early decrees shed light on questions only now re-emerging as pertinent to the FRAND debate: the meaning of the non-discrimination prong of the FRAND commitment, the degree to which courts should intervene in the determination of reasonable royalty rates, the use of arbitration as a means for resolving licensing disputes, the extent to which royalty-free licensing may be “reasonable”, the effects of a potential licensee’s refusal to accept a patent… [read post]
