Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 4921 - 4940 of 10,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
Le (§2.4.4) addressing police racial profiling, trespass, and false imprisonment; the opinion dissenting from the Supreme Court of the United States’ denial of certiorari in Baxter v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Moving forward two decades, Foster Wheeler was able to show that Bethlehem Steel’s Medical Director, Dr. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am by Paul D. Knothe
Ventura County District Attorney Gregory Totten, prior to the announcement of the Johnson decision, requested the Attorney General’s opinion on two questions: Does Penal Code section 832.7, subdivision (a), authorize a district attorney, for the purpose of complying with the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm by The Charge
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
The Court has asked for the views of the United States in three additional cases - No. 06-923, Metlife v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:49 am
Dorf contends...the tradition of contingency arrangements is even older than the United States of America. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Community members wouldn't be able to use the information about the lawsuit to update their judgments about the plaintiff. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am by Curtis Bradley
And the Court distances itself from some of the broad presidential power dicta in United States v. [read post]