Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 4921 - 4940 of 155,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
EPA - in making regulatory law more democratic - may supersede the immediate consequences for greenhouse gas regulations.Mass v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Shapiro v McManus Holds Three-Judge Panels Must Hear Redistricting Cases appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 11:12 am by Erin
Both the JCPC and the Supreme Court explicitly state that it is not the place of the court to evaluate the wisdom or morality of discrimination in the law, their only role is to evaluate the constitutionality of the law. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Garver Professor of Jurisprudence at the Yale Law School. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm by Bexis
  Howard I, of course, did not purport to decide that such a parallel claim existed under state law. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
Lewis & Clark Law Review’s latest issue and it features a business forum on the Supreme Court’s recent patent decision in KSR v. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 10:45 am by Eric Goldman
On the other hand, if even Minnesota’s expert finds Generative AI useful to preparing important material in support of the state’s policies, perhaps the court ought to question the state’s anti-AI motives with extra scrutiny. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:21 pm
  More than forty states passed laws excluding the term "economic development" from the reasons government may take a property. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am by DONALD SCARINCI
 However, in defending its controversial abortion law, the State of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn its prior decisions in Roe v. [read post]