Search for: "People v. House"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 13,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:53 pm
Old people usually own houses. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:07 am
Ondricko v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
The case is Commodores Entm’t Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
The court must find that no reasonable cause exists to believe that you committed the offense for which the arrest was made, (see People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
Sell the land and build the house. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 1:51 pm
The White House said that the FBI is investigating the matter. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeals holds that these restrictions do not violate the Second Amendment.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 12:34 pm
Supreme Court (Frazier v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:03 am
That suit, Jonas et al v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]
21 May 2022, 7:32 pm
Cordileone formally notified Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, of the consequences under Church law of her support for codifying Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:21 am
David Simpson, a small-l libertarian Republican Texas state rep from Longview, authored an Independence Day column in his local paper opining that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling in Riley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 am
To be struck down, the law must violate a provision of the applicable Federal or state Constitution.A recent example of this principle showed up in Fite v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:53 am
Jeffrey Kahn explored the issue of passport denials as it relates to Doe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:18 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
Supreme Court.Not once, but twice.The latest rendition of Lozman v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 11:58 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Van Buren v. [read post]