Search for: "STATE v MILLER"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 5,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
The judgment on the “meaning application” in Miller v Associated Newspapers [2010] EWHC 700 (QB) was given on 31 March 2010 – the pleaded meanings were struck out but the article was held to be capable of bearing a defamatory meaning. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
(Ars Technica) Get your e-book on the iPad (and keep the royalties) (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California: Facebook preliminarily wins copyright lawsuit over third party app: Miller v Facebook (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Utah: Jury confirms Novell owns Unix copyrights – Linux remains free: SCO Group v Novell (eLegal) (Tangible IP) (Ars Technica) (Eyes on IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:39 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
Miller's contention that a finding of improper influence instead of fabrication fits better with the facts of the case. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Because the Administration hopes to take shelter in a cryptic 1948 decision, Hirota v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:08 pm
Mike Miller. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:47 am
About a year later, he sued the company in state court. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm
And how do you square Terry v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:03 am
State Court Judge Raymond S. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Miller, Second Amendment Equilibria, 116 Nw. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Miller, 44 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 442 (1968) (field preemption involves "a domain of exclusively federal competence") (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm
The most famous case of this type is the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 1995); Miller v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
That decision applied to earlier cases the 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
