Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 48,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 3:58 am
Vigilance from the bench relative to the collection of fines is one thing; but incarceration of a defendant that lacks any ability to pay constitutes a debtor's prison.Incarceration for the inability to pay fines and costs was proscribed by the United States Supreme Court in the 1983 case of Bearden v Georgia. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court's Decision in Windsor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:44 am
Despite the fact that shareholder proposals are an important engine of corporate democracy, the SEC failed to meet its legal obligation to provide an economic analysis of the proposed rule’s costs and benefits, while offering purported justifications for the amendments that were "flawed at every turn," the plaintiffs contend (Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Motion for taxation of costs, granted.Duncanson v Bloomington, Case No. 6:14-cv-704-PGB-KRS (M.D. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:14 pm
For example, potential costs might include: (i) the notification costs/letters to affected customers informing them of the data breach; (ii) establishment of a call center/1-800 number to provide information to affected customers; (iii) costs for credit monitoring services; (iv) costs of identity restoration services or fraud resolution services; (v) costs of identity theft insurance provided for the benefit of affected customers; (vi) … [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:30 am
(Hroncich v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
In November, 2013 the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in the case of Staff Management v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:14 pm
City of Chicago v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
LB Brent v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) is an appeal from the county court. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:33 am
An early example of this policy in action is Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
LB Brent v Shulem B Association Ltd [2011] EWHC 1663 (Ch) is an appeal from the county court. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 7:45 am
While state Medicaid agencies are responsible for "Medicare cost-sharing" (i.e. paying a dual-enrolled patient's co-payments and deductibles), both Michigan and Missouri have place caps on the Medicare cost-sharing under their Medicaid programs. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:02 pm
v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 5:11 am
The opinion is styled, Arizpe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 pm
SBS Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 3:39 am
Crystal.If not, Guerrero v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:44 am
You’re fired.'" Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:02 pm
v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:45 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed with the CCAF's objection, and, in Feder v. [read post]
