Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 4941 - 4960 of 12,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 5:00 am by Susan Brenner
App. 500,, 27 P.3d 1048 (2001, involved a defendant who undisputedly used electronic mail (e-mail) to transmit pornographic images. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 5:41 am by Falk Metzler
The Board does not deny that, as the appellant has pointed out, the claimed system is new (over the notorious prior art) and involves technical considerations. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
The trial court ruled for ASEA, holding that the First Amendment “does not require the State to alter the union dues deduction practices in place prior to” the attorney general opinion. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:17 pm
On 27 July 1999, the district court dismissed the State from the lawsuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am by Alexis Boaz
However, as CMS does not face similar time constraints for the Part D provisions, the Part D Initial Rebate Guidance does not contain “final guidance. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Although this may not cause a considerable impact on professional sports leagues and teams if the player is a substitute who does not play, consider if the situation arose in the case of a marquee player. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
Although the focus of electronic transactions regimes tends to be on signatures, signatures should not be addressed in isolation from other relevant formalities[1]. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
Although the focus of electronic transactions regimes tends to be on signatures, signatures should not be addressed in isolation from other relevant formalities[1]. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Harry Cole
 However, the rule does provide a “safe harbor” for VPOs: their captioning will be deemed to have satisfied the rule if they provide captions to the VPD using the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers Timed Text format (SMPTE ST 2052-1:2010: “Timed Text Format (SMPTE-TT)” 2010). [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
For this purpose, ProtonMail must without delay „grant access to [its] facilities“ and „provide the information required for the surveillance“ (art. 27 para. 1 SPTA). [read post]