Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 9:03 am
Indeed, such cases are still fairly common in North Carolina, and occasionally litigated in a few other states, such as Utah and Mississippi. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Our holding should also be of special interest to those concerned with the evolution of surveillance by state actors or by those purporting to act at their direction. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
In light of the recent decision of the New Jersey Appellate Division in the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:56 am
Over the past few years, this blog has followed the Tempnology case out of New Hampshire raising just that issue. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
I'll talk about the public-interest analysis again soon (from an antitrust angle), but for now I'd just like to show you (a) the initial determination and, below that one, (b) the ITC's call for public-interest statements (which are due by November 8; by coincidence, that's also the date of the next Qualcomm v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:39 am
 In State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:07 pm
Here is an interesting 2017 opinion (People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
[This is the first of two posts, the first five entries being set out below, preceded by a few introductory paragraphs. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm
HotChalk v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
A “an extremely strongly” state interest, rather than a “compelling one”; and “a close fit” rather than “narrowly tailored. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:22 am
ColbAs readers know, I have spent the last few weeks identifying the many ugly features of Justice Alito's (SA's) draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
State, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:40 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:31 pm
Anyhow, here’s a few opinion for your perusal: The first of the day: Davis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
So heavy was the defense of corporate expression in the opening stages of the argument in Sorrell, et al., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (indirectly quoting R.A.V.); United States v. [read post]
