Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe"
Results 4941 - 4960
of 19,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 4:54 am
Inter-parte proceedings will usually take at least a month to be heard, although where urgency can be established the matter can be heard in a matter of days. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Unsympathetic constitutional authorities may invalidate constitutional provisions that they claim are inconsistent with fundamental constitutional commitments or were not adopted by constitutionally processes. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
Your Curmudgeon takes pride in his attention to details -- and he does not like being misled. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Professor Albert demonstrates as much expertise discussing the Constitution of the United States as he does the Constitutions of Columbia and the Central African Republic. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
It does, however, have a number of "Basic Laws" that set out the structure of government, elections, offices, and so forth, as well as a limited number of rights. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm
Though the bill does not include some of the broader reforms included in earlier reauthorization proposals, it does involve “some significant changes to 702. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:45 am
The resolution was unanimously adopted 32-0, with the US, the EU, and others abstaining. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
And, for that matter, the dicta in Volvo run both ways. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 5:41 am
We would view the matter differently if the attorney and the client had reached a mutual understanding as to what the settlement goals would be, and then the client later departed from that understanding and adopted a substantially different settlement objective. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
However, the opinion for the Court in Rita does not say that those circuits which have resisted this presumption have to adopt the presumption (though I would suspect some now might). [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:04 pm
(That is, unless the Judge finds the Anthony’s don’t have standing for such a motion – in which case the State should adopt the motion.) [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:47 pm
So why does this matter to non-banking/non-financial institutions? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:45 am
They also arise when an adoption occurs. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 10:55 am
The SJC noted that it had already ruled, in an earlier case, that the Buckhannon test does not apply to Massachusetts fee-shifting statutes, but it had never explicitly adopted the catalyst test. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:04 pm
” What does that mean? [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:23 am
However, the opinion for the Court in Rita does not say that those circuits which have resisted this presumption have to adopt the presumption (though I would suspect some now might). [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 8:30 am
In some ways, appointing the commission acknowledges that a bill adopted in 2006 allowing local governments to restructure themselves has not succeeded. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm
” Because … Professor Martin and Professor Riel, each of the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, describe the business function which lacks a strategy in the article cited above: “Does it really matter if … choices are made without an explicit strategy? [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:45 am
They also arise when an adoption occurs. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Who does such a ruling benefit, other than the convicted murderer? [read post]
