Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 4941 - 4960 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
It doesn't even provide a cross-reference. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 11:00 am by Paul Cassell
District Court for the Northern District of Texas set a trial date (June 23rd) in United State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some studies rely on parents’ reporting; not persuasive v. studies where a doctor confirms that the event occurred. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:52 am by Dan Bressler
.'” “This thorough and nearly constant vetting process is why the people who thought they knew Madigan well firmly believed that he understood where the legal lines were and that he had never crossed them. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Balganesh argues that the wrong of trolling is that it encourages trolls to sue people whose uses are harmless to the true author/owner and therefore, in the absence of trolling, tolerated though infringing. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]