Search for: "Brown v. State" Results 4961 - 4980 of 8,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
GTE for the proposition with Weil and Brown stating: Whether the above statue allows video recording opposing counsel instead of the witness is “questionable. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in questioning Judge Jackson last week, Texas Senator John Cornyn repeatedly referred to the right to same-sex marriage, which the Supreme Court recognized in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
Thus, an individual exposed to the virus can be reasonably assured that he or she is free of infection if tests conducted six months after the exposure are negative (see, Brown v New York City Health and Hosps. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Smith, 375 N.C. 152, 2020-NCSC-45, ¶ 16; State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
’” Id. at *4 (quoting Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d at 1074; quoting United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm by Jon McLaughlin
"[18]   The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19]  Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
Browne (1807) 8 East 162 and (1807) 14 Ves Jun 156; Parker v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm by NL
Browne (1807) 8 East 162 and (1807) 14 Ves Jun 156; Parker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
A ruling extending that reasoning beyond capital cases “could be the Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2023, there was a hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Davidoff and others v Brown QB-2020-002760. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am by Alyssa Rosen
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm by Mike
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong dismissed the federal claims and remanded the others to state court. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:28 am by Conor McEvily
At the Huffington Post, Jelena Hasbrouck suggests that if Perry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & [*2]Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]). [read post]