Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 7,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
In this case courts will usually undertake an “economic realities” test, which considers five factors articulated in the Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
.; Citron v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 4:54 pm
IndiaUmesh Kumar v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
Oh, and let's return briefly to the 1709 Blog: While the United States has its Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC: here, with links to earlier posts), most of Europe seems to be missing the point, assuming that the way to deal with the big anti-counterfeiting issues is for more pan-European cooperation between OHIM and national offices. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
It is clear that politics in the United States frequently depart from norms of comity and respect. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
Lasswell, Cooperation for Research in Psychiatry and Law, 117 Am. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
However, in Lobo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
It can be difficult to hold governmental bodies accountable based on regulatory authority using the modified Anns/Cooper test in conjunction with Edwards v. the Law Society of Upper Canada.. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
Cooper v Turrell, heard 24 November 2011 (Tugendhat J) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 28 November 2011 (Eady J) Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 (Judge CJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Also on Inforrm last week News: Defamation in Israel – are the proposed amendments to the law objectionable? [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:53 am
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm
Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Qualcomm faces an increased risk of a San Jose-like experience in San Diego, with the only structural difference that makes the outcome harder to predict being the involvement of a jury, while the FTC trial was a bench trial (before a judge without a jury).At the Thursday hearing, Judge Curiel made an explicit reference to the FTC case, describing Judge Koh's partial summary judgment on Qualcomm's… [read post]
