Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 4961 - 4980
of 36,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:01 am
" Samsung is not a party to Oracle v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
 It asserts that the phrase “DRA†does not unambiguously include attorney, and that treating attorneys as DRAs would lead to absurd results. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:41 pm
In Porter Development, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
” Rossignol, 316 F.3d at 521 (quoting McIntyre v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
” Iskanian v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
CLEMENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:22 am
In Solano v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
However, the recent case of Sean Morrison Entertainment v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
In VanHook v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
Sept. 25, 2006):Plaintiffs brought a putative class action against their former attorneys . . . . [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:40 am
Berguis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
It does not happen. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Does he declare a mistrial? [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
She does a very good job, for example, explaining that in a lot of these borrower lawsuits, there's nothing really at issue other than preliminary injunctive relief. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm
Von Hake v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Odhavji Estate v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
A legal malpractice claim requires, among other things, the existence of an attorney-client relationship between the client and the attorney (see Maddux v Schur, 16 AD3d 873, 874 [3d Dept 2005]; Tabner v Drake, 9 AD3d 606, 609 [3d Dept 2004]). [read post]
