Search for: "People v. House" Results 4961 - 4980 of 11,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Ilya Shapiro
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
It examined that related issue three years ago, but the ruling in the case of Evenwel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
Sandwell (and they are far from alone in this) having been taking Disability Living Allowance into account when assessing people for Discretionary Housing Payments for rent shortfalls. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
’ In fact the human rights defence approach to possession proceedings has started in the wake Manchester v Pinnock with the case of Mr Alan Clark, a tenant of West Kent Housing Association, again mentioned in Inside Housing who argued that evicting him for anti social behaviour was a breach of his human rights because the landlord had other methods of curbing his behaviour available as an alternative to possession, for instance issuing an injunction against him.… [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 6:44 am
Garcia was arrested outside his uncle's house in Tonala at the end of February, and then put into extradition proceedings.[3]This summer, a Mexican court approved his extradition, but Mr. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:32 am by Rosa Schechter
  Lots of people are still combing through all the things that the Florida Legislature undertook in 2012; here are two new laws that are of interest to Florida real estate developers and investors. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:06 am by Heather Boutet
Heading off to college is an exciting prospect for young people, many of whom are living away from home for the first time and experiencing unprecedented freedoms. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]