Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 4961 - 4980 of 18,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller, along with Judge Price, concurred to say that without the conversation, the defense failed to establish a violation of Article 36.22. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:08 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Price, writing for the majority, explained that a hearing on a motion for new trial may be necessary to develop a record to show harm from a denial of a motion for continuance, but that doesn't mean it's a sufficient prerequitie to obtaining appellate relief. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm by RiskProf
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:08 pm
"   What neither Easterbrook nor Wright discusses, however, is that the mutual fund industry features a uniquely rigid segregation of sophisticated investors from unsophisticated -- with the former buying one set of investments and the latter buying a very differently priced one -- which neutralizes the possibility that sophisticated sentinels will protectively police for all. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:12 pm by Annemarie Bridy
In its analysis of the jurisdictional question, the court accepted Verizon’s analysis of the broadband market with respect to the likely negative impact of a two-way pricing model (i.e., a model that allows broadband providers to charge both users and edge providers) on broadband deployment. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:27 am by Lyle Denniston
In a second granted case, Plumhoff v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am by J.W. Verret
” This project is inspired by the DC Circuit’s opinion in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ingrida Jakuseva, Olswang LLP
However, those sums came from the purchase price paid by Clyde to Strathcroft for 278 Glasgow Road. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:47 pm by INFORRM
Although it is not so stated in the judgment, presumably David Price submitted that this principle applies even where the first article is on the front page, and the second article is elsewhere in the paper. [read post]