Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 481 - 500
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 3:54 am
Yale lawprof Akhil Reed Amar has an op-ed entitled “A Liberal’s Case For Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:21 am
One issue features, you know, articles on “The Inducement Standard of Patentability (which appears to discuss significant issues of patent law and policy), “Taxation and Liquidity” (which does address a significant tax policy issue), and Akhil Amar’s “America’s Lived Constitution” (which explores the domain of unenumerated rights – and which might be of actual use to someone Roberts, C.J. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
Akhil Amar and a pre-Bruen essay by Prof. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
Adopting his thesis makes sense if you believe that originalism is required by the rule of law (Barnett, me), by the benefits of supermajority procedures (McGinnis and Rappaport), as a framework for politics and constitutional construction (me), as a requirement of democratic legitimacy (Whittington, Bork, me), or as a basis for judicial restraint (Bork, Scalia, and many others).By contrast, Gerard's stipulation about who is engaged in originalist interpretation not only leaves people like me… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Lash does not accurately describe the work of Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, Andrew Koppelman, Donald Regan, Robert Stern, and others. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 3:10 pm
., Akhil Amar’s Intratextualism article and Adrian Vermeule’s and Ernie Young’s critique of that article.) [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm
The Clause has been misread by the Supreme Court for 140 years, starting with the Court’s 1873 ruling in The Slaughterhouse Cases, and as Yale Law School’s Akhil Amar has summarized: “Virtually no serious modern scholar -- left, right, and center -- thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:21 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and a long line of renowned scholars across the ideological spectrum – including Akhil Amar, Steven Calabresi and others – have recognized that “[e]ver since the 19th amendment, women are citizens of equal stature with men. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
The constitutional and policy arguments are sketched out pretty well by others, ranging from James Madison to Clinton Rossiter to Akhil Reed Amar. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:07 pm
Outside the judiciary, leading liberal constitutional law scholars such as Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, and Sandy Levinson have defended the idea that the Second Amendment protects an important individual right enforceable against all levels of government. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
Montana law school) first wrote on the constitutionality of the health control law on Jan. 23, 2010, responding to a Los Angeles Times essay by Akhil Amar, who also writes for Balkinization. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:11 am
The list is organized alphabetically by host school and has been updated since the last list appeared on April 19.Albany: Megan Fairlie (Florida International) (2010-11)Brooklyn: Donna Coker (Miami) (Fall 2010)Case Western Reserve: Tawia Ansah (New England School of Law) (Fall 2010)Charleston: Angela Laughlin (Texas Tech) (2010-11)Columbia: Akhil Amar (Yale) (Fall 2010); Jody Kraus (Virginia) (2010-11); Daniel Rodriguez (Texas) (Spring 2011);… [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm
Candor requires noting that both Jack and I have contributed to legitimizing the Second and Fourteenth Amendment arguments (as have, among other political liberals, Laurence Tribe and Akhil Reed Amar). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
Apropos the current discussion of unilateral presidential power, much of which is dominated by Yale faculty, former and present, and Yale alumni, Ike turns out to be a classic Whig, totally out of sympathy, I think it is fair to say, not only with the executive-branch exuberance expressed most strongly by John Yoo, but also, I strongly suspect, with a milder version, by Akhil Amar, whose contribution to Slate was titled "Bomb Away, Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
” At Slate, Akhil Amar offers advice on what Solicitor General Verrilli “should have said. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 12:22 pm
In that piece, moreover, I suggested, as has Akhil Amar in the current issue of the Harvard Law Review, that a far stronger defense of the outcome could be found in a "living" or "dynamic" Constitution that didn't stop in 1791.But Justice Alito also apparently suggested that my criticism of the professional incompetence (from the standpoint of trained historians) was vitiated by the fact that I myself am not a professionally trained historian. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
A very important goal of the casebook that I co-edit (along with Jack, Akhil Reed Amar, and Reva Siegel)is to raise just such questions about personal and institutional competence. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
The Guarantee Clause, as my colleague Akhil Amar has pointed out, was designed to prevent temporary majorities or even minorities from using the levers of government to entrench themselves in power. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
This is, incidentally, one of the things that is potentially disastrous--and, Akhil and Vik Amar have argued, unconstitutional--about the present succession in office act, by which Nancy Pelosi is now second in line for the White House should anything happen to Bush and Cheney. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
") Story's view has been revived in modern times by Akhil Amar and has a lot going for it as a matter of constitutional text, but it is much embarrassed by the Judiciary Act of 1789, which clearly did not vest federal courts with jurisdiction over all constitutional (or other federal) cases. [read post]
