Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 481 - 500
of 34,077
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 9:12 am
On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5 (A.B. 5). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:37 pm
Recently, in McPherson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
I am probably in the minority on this, but I happen to feel that the New York court got it right in the Aon Risk Services v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The defendant pointed to a California appellate decision in Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Click here to read the court's decision in Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm
In Wesson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
In California, an idea theft claim is based in large part on the California Supreme Court case of Desny v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am
Details of AB5 The law requires that workers in California be considered an employee unless employers can show that the work they perform meets the rigorous criteria as designated in last year’s California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:48 am
California Central District Judge James V. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
In general, California law does not require employers to provide vacation pay to their employees. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:42 am
Given the prevalence of wage-hour class actions filed against California employers, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals from time to time asks the California Supreme Court to clarify certain California wage-hour laws. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
In Barker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
"Said Justice Alito, at oral argument yesterday in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 11:12 pm
The new law clarifies an issue left open by the California Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:06 pm
The bill specifically exempts attorneys providing advice in the course of practicing law and anyone who provides advice to his or her employer. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm
Adamson (Seattle University School of Law) has posted Ricci v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:07 am
The California Supreme Court this morning heard oral arguments in Northcoast Women's Care Medical Group v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:11 pm
The case in question is Murphy v. [read post]
