Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 481 - 500 of 15,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
We hope your wedding plans work out and speaking of V-Day, have you seen this patent application? [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:25 am
No mention is made of the issues that first positioned Falwell to become a national figure. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
I can't quite figure out what is going on in the case of Capitol Records v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:25 am
No mention is made of the issues that first positioned Falwell to become a national figure. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:31 pm by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
I figure phones will be ringing off the hook tomorrow in some offices, so let me give you the fast and dirty breakdown of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But Iqbal is still a new case, and the Court of Appeals is still trying to figure it all out.The case is DiPetto v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
At The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, Jess Bravin reports that “Hawaii may figure prominently” in the Court’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
Both cases involve two pleas in law; 1) alleging breach of the principle of legal certainty and infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 [decisions of the Office shall state the reasons on which they are based]; and 2) alleging infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 [cannot register mark that it is identical or similar to the earlier mark, and is to be registered for goods or services which are not similar, where the earlier mark has a reputation and use of the mark would… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:07 pm by Fredrick Vars
My own econometric analysis of gun purchase delays mirrors the 3% figure,... [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:46 am by Nedim Malovic
Other factors may also be considered, such as the distribution channels of the goods concerned (Caventa v OHIM, T‑224/11).In the present case, the goods were neither of the same nature nor the same purpose, nor were they of the same type nor intended for the same purpose or for the same use. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm by John W. Arden
Arden.A newspaper’s inflated circulation claims could not form the basis of a Lanham Act false advertising action brought by the publisher of a free television guide because the publisher did not begin soliciting advertisers until after the newspaper publicly acknowledged its misstatements and revised its circulation claims and because the inflated circulation figures were not part of a commercial campaign, according to the federal district court in Central Islip, New York (Conte… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:13 pm
  You're worried that the police might figure out it's you if you use peer-to-peer sharing over your own internet connection. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:12 pm
  My guess is that a nontrivial number of members of the California appellate judicary have "substantial fortunes" that meet or exceed this figure. [read post]