Search for: "Gardner v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Committee Comments Effective December 1, 1997 In Cantu v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
However, few teams will change in strength too much from last year.College FootballGame MatchupsAugust 23 to September 1,2008 (visitor v. home)Game below played on August 30 unless otherwise stated. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
Ladies and Gentlemen, please take your seats… our play is about to begin… I just want to make sure that everyone is with us before our curtain is raised… Max Gardner, are you here? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" Back in the United States, politicians are walking on eggshells. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Tom states: If you think that a secret is something you tell one person at a time, you’re in the wrong job. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
See Knake Jefferson at 34 (citing State ex rel, Okla Bar Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 11:55 am
Supreme Court's January decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
But there is a persuasive Ninth Circuit case, Gardner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
According to consumer bankruptcy attorney and nationally known foreclosure defense guru, Max Gardner… “This case may well be the final dagger in the deep dark heart of the MERS business model. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
(See, e.g., Benjamin Careathers v. [read post]
