Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 481 - 500
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
” Howard Wasserman responds to Fontana’s article on PrawfsBlawg, saying “[t]he whole piece is worth a read” but that he is unconvinced by Fontana’s description of a lack of eligible liberals to serve as federal judges. [read post]
1 May 2010, 4:50 am
Over at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman, forsaking the pedagogical oath to make everything sound more academic than it is, concludes that the law is dead. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
Our current list of attendees and/or presenters include: Mike Cahill, Miriam Baer, Nelson Tebbe, Verity Winship, Bill Araiza, Katy Kuh, Hillel Levin, Howard Wasserman, Giovanna Shay, Chris Lund, and Marc Blitz (and me). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am
” Howard Wasserman of Prawfsblawg and Mauro agree that the case does not interest many people, but both find reasons to pay attention. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:02 am
Howard Wasserman (Prawfs Blawg) has posted a paper to SSRN – “Orwell’s Vision: Video and the Future of Civil Rights Enforcment” (also available in Maryland Law Review). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
Howard Wasserman, a few weeks ago, made a "modest proposal" to ban PowerPoint and laptop use altogether. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
Howard Wasserman (Florida International) has posted on SSRN his recent symposium piece, Iqbal, Procedural Mismatches, and Civil Rights Litigation, 14 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Howard Wasserman agrees at Prawfsblawg. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Howard Wasserman, writing for PrawfsBlawg, covers the recent introduction of a working version of the Notice Pleading Restoration Act of 2010, which provides that the standards applicable on May 20, 2007 – the day Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:42 am
Howard M. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses concern that the Court will use the case to “further limit the scope of public-space expression. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
Wasserman, Iqbal, Procedural Mismatches, and Civil Rights Litigation, (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 157, 2010.Tom Tyler, Stephen J. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
Muchnick, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg praises the opinion for getting a jurisdictional issue “just right and in a straight-forward way, with a minimum of complications or confusion. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:42 pm
Howard M. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
Muchnick may be interested in today's commentary by Professor Howard Wasserman (Florida International) over at PrawfsBlawg: Copyright and the (hopefully) end of drive-by jurisdictional rulings. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 am
From Howard Wasserman (FIU) comes news of a torts visitor opening at Florida International University in Miami: Florida International University College of Law invites applications from candidates for one or more visiting faculty positions beginning in Fall 2010. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:08 pm
.: lawprof tired of people carrying on about being dragged through litigation, it’s not as if they’re being held liable [Howard Wasserman, Prawfsblawg] Iceland’s free-press project “is largely symbolic – which is not to say unimportant” [N.Y. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
See Bernie's comment to Howard Wasserman's post (http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2010/02/being-sued-v-being-held-liable.html) about the difference between being sued and being held liable on PrawfsBlawg: It seems to me that the interesting question here is how this set of preconceptions differs, if at all, from the dynamics of blame in our culture more generally.A lawsuit is, for most people not twisted by overexposure to our legal system, about blame. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm
Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman in an online Federalist Society roundtable on the recent Supreme Court Citizens United decision. [read post]
