Search for: "In Re: Katrina" Results 481 - 500 of 861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
He provides links to discussions and commentary about the effects of Katrina on the Gulf Coast legal community. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:30 am by Ron Friedmann
One panelist took responsibility for paralegals to help re-invent them and re-tool them. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by Ernie Svenson
Oh, and whenever you’re ready…here are some ways I can help you improve your practice. 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:19 am
  This Times-Picayune story on the Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation made no sense to me: the decision was wrong because two of the three-judge panel were appointed by Bush and all three are from Texas and therefore don't understand Louisiana law. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:02 am by Rusty Shackleford
We’re likely to see some more complex lawsuits from the individuals and businesses that depend on the Gulf ecosystem for their livelihoods, especially fisherman. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:36 am by Evan Schwartz
App. 381, 386-87, 1 S.W.3d 459, 462 (1999) 4 In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:28 am by Steven M. Gursten
Industry profits have risen considerably over the past few years, despite significant catastrophic events such as Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 3:25 am
Speaking of insurance, Hurricane Katrina lawsuits are finally starting to go to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Bernard Project, a non-profit that helps those displaced by Hurricane Katrina return to the area. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:14 am
One presidential candidate was, but remaining ones don't get around to that topic much.Cooper Monroe and Emily McKhann were on top of helping after Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:50 am
  And about Katrina litigation, yes indeed, I will talk about all that. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
  The fact that Scruggs had just contributed $33,000 to his re-election campaign, he said, had absolutely nothing to do with his decision -- didn't even serve as an attention-getter.Another curious aspect of Hood's testimony is he portrayed himself far differently than he has throughout his career, especially when running for re-election last year. [read post]