Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 13,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 9:48 pm
Office of Hawaiian Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
(Defamation; Nuisance: Counterclaims) United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 10:35 am
Here is the opinion in County of Amador v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 8:12 pm
The real issue here is whether the Kentucky State Constitution empowers Universities with the authority to take land. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
Here is the opinion in Medina v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:00 am
In Town of Colorado City v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 10:19 am
Here is the opinion in Perkins v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Martin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
United States (C.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 12:18 pm
United States (D.D.C.): 1 Complaint [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
United States [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:24 pm
Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice (prisoner, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:20 am
The case is entitled Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
On Monday, I talked about 2023 developments in asylum border processing, including the new rebuttable presumption of ineligibility for asylum that applies to noncitizens who enter the United States from Mexico at the southwest land border per this final rule.... [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm
This morning I presented a seminar on the case of West Linn Corporate Park v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with… [read post]
