Search for: "Lucas v State"
Results 481 - 500
of 705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), or leaves land "without economically beneficial or productive options for its use," Lucas v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:04 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Id., at 745.Washington State Grange v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Id., at 745.Washington State Grange v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
Failure to follow this axiom left the tenant in Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:20 am
See State v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:28 am
L v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm
Boersema, Lucas ReijndersWater ResourcesIntroduction to water resources and environmental issues / Karrie Lynn Pennington, Thomas V. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 2010 - “Campaigns for Judicial Office: The Impact of Caperton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 12:54 pm
º, concluding that the responsibility envisaged is irrespective of fault, but stated that responsibility imposed on the controller for acts of the processor is too burdensome and may lead to over deterrence. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:45 am
Meier and Lucas E. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:18 am
So, for example, “[t]he more descriptive the term the more extensive must be the use to show that the mark has acquired secondary meaning to become distinctive of a particular company,” Jason Hachkowski v Lucas Barnes, D2009-1800 (WIPO February 5, 2010) (. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
So holds the Lucas case. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
