Search for: "Lucas v State" Results 481 - 500 of 621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
  And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  The subject matter simply does not lend itself to broad rules: the most recent attempt to make it more rule-based was Justice Scalia’s opnion in Lucas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 am by xsimpledemo
Devenney On March 22, 2012, the Indiana Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision relating to Project safety in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 am by xsimpledemo
Devenney On March 22, 2012, the Indiana Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision relating to Project safety in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:24 am
Such claims for compensation are fostered by the 1992 decision, Lucas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R v Markham and Edwards ([2017] EWCA Crim 739) the Court of Appeal upheld the order of Haddon-Cave J permitting the press to name Kim Edwards and Lucas Markham, 15 year olds, who were convicted of the murder of Ms Edwards’ mother and sister. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am by familoo
Even the Lucas direction is distilled : People can tell lies about some things and still tell the truth about other things. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of  Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]