Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 481 - 500
of 14,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2025, 7:29 am
" Moreover, the mark "lacks any additional fanciful, arbitrary, or suggestive matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
” It’s not clear to what extent Trump’s opinion on this matters, but he can certainly hold things up in court. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" "[T]he view must still provide substantial, additional details to complete the image of the flag of Canada. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:16 am
Unfortunate, because this permission is frequently abused, especially by less experienced trademark counsel, or perhaps when the strength of a case doesn’t seem like enough without injecting an unhealthy dose of emotion into the matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
So no, I mean, there are situations where the court obviously has to resolve, as a legal matter, issues that are of great political significance. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:55 am
(1) Were the claims within the subject matter of copyright? [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
” Strength: the court bungles conceptual strength (conflating suggestive and descriptive), but it doesn’t matter because (a) there’s not much evidence of marketplace strength and (b) it doesn’t matter anyway because this is a labeling case [the court doesn’t say (b) outright but it’s true]. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING WAS FILED SOME 8 DAYS LATEWhen MF requested a religious accommodation from the NYC Board of Education’s vaccination mandate, not only was she denied same on March 7, 2022, by the City of New York Reasonable Accommodation Appeals Panel, but her subsequent challenge, filed with the New York County Supreme Court pursuant to CPLR Article 78, was similarly rebuffed.On appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that MF’s Supreme Court proceeding was… [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:01 am
” Pleading facts indicating that a mark is well-known doesn’t suffice. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
The appearance of the drug doesn’t matter. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:08 am
"In other words, are 'HALAU' and 'HULA' essential and integral subject matter missing from the drawing? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
It marks the middle of the year. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am
Binding precedent establishes that §2(a) doesn’t violate the First Amendment because it doesn’t ban use of a mark. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:59 am
No matter your age, you want to feel healthy, energetic, and live an active life. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 2:56 am
Applicant called it "akin to packaging," but isn't it some "tertium quid" that is neither product shape nor packaging? [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:24 pm
It doesn’t matter if the later use is likely to cause confusion — the standard for trademark infringement. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 12:00 pm
In this episode of Senior Matters, host Mark E. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 9:05 am
In this episode of Senior Matters, host Mark Wight speaks with Tina Barnett, Tech Ed Program Manager for the Lifelong Education and Aging Resource Network (LEARN, Idaho). [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 1:52 am
With Messi (see cases C-449/18P and C-474/18P MESSI) and Miley Cyrus (case T‑368/20 MILEY CYRUS), we learnt that reputation or renown of (personal) names is a factor which should be taken in consideration when comparing marks and which may ultimately exclude confusion with an earlier similar mark. [read post]