Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 481 - 500 of 3,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
Including the votes of conservative judges like Pamela Rymer and Milan Smith. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It allows people to sue under the Equal Protection Clause when they get screwed by the government. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
Smith (Federal Jurisdiction; Indian Country Land Status) State Courts Bulletin Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:11 am
It is somewhat paradoxical, then, that the recent Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Smith, 860 S.E.2d 51 (2021) (unpublished) (citing this framework from Hobbs). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
Today's Ninth Circuit opinion may turn a lot of things into illegal gambling -- at least under Washington state law.Judge Smith's opinion holds that the computer application "Big Fish Casino" entails illegal gambling because you get an initial purchase of "chips" but then, if you run out of chips, have to buy more. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
  MCL 777.31” The Court again considered the applications in People v Corrin and People v Miller, which were held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Smith, which was decided this past December. [read post]