Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 481 - 500
of 767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 June 2015, there was a statement in open court in the case of Kelly v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police before Nicol J. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
See Texas v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 9:47 pm
Screen Gems, Inc. (1959) 174 Cal.App.2d 650, 653, 344 P.2d 799; Kelly v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm
Perry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
” On Thursday 17 January, Kelly Hoppen sought further disclosure from suspended News of the World journalist Dan Evans and from the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
” After Gregg v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Judge Paul Joseph Kelly, Jr. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
” Kelly Ng reports for BBC News. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
They are already compromising their supposed right to intrude into people’s privacy through the offices of the PCC. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
On a day-to-day basis, I was supervised by Dr Ziegler and to a lesser extent by Dr Kelly. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
The new case law, McCormick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Justice Thomas delivers another unanimous opinion, in Mussachio v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
UMG v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
