Search for: "People v. Lewis" Results 481 - 500 of 1,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
However, the case cited by defendant does not represent a change in the decisional law as it was decided prior to the appellate decision in this case and relied upon other decisions of both the Appellate Division and the Appellate Term of the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts standing for the same proposition (see, People v Lewis, 16 3d 173 [1 Dept. 2005]; Patil v Country-Wide Ins. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
” IPSO 022538-22 A woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02539-22 A woman v Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10744-22 Gannon v Basildon Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09814-23 Leary v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
    Did you and/or the PCC agree to pay damages to Mark Lewis to settle his libel suit against each of you? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd heard 25 February 2011 (Tugendhat J) Lewis v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard 3 and 4 March 2011 (Tugendhat J) ETK v News Group Newspapers, heard 10 March 2011 (Ward, Laws and Moore-Bick LJJ) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
But, as Greenhouse puts it, “The same facts can speak very differently to different people–and to different judges. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
This could affect a fair few people. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Powell suggested just that in his concurrence in Lewis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  As soon as she did, I used it and learned that in 1919 the Court granted Charles Evans Hughes's request that each side receive two hours to argue Commercial Cable Co. v. [read post]