Search for: "People v. Woods" Results 481 - 500 of 1,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
And, not to brag, but I'm pretty sure we're going to get another $50 added to our budget, which will allow us to invite another 8 people to Harpdrygal V next year. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
"  Judge Diane Wood ruled, relying on the language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
  Similarly, perhaps Second Amendment advocates can and should be able to use the ruling in Miller v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
Moreover, we alleged that her arrest was without a lawful warrant, probable cause or other lawful authority in violation of the rights guaranteed by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Finally, we sought to suppress any statements obtained from our client, as well as her identity, were obtained in violation of her rights pursuant to the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, sections 9, 16, and… [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 5:00 am by Kevin
Parker did, saying for that and other reasons she found Wood less than credible. [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
Thurman of the Magistrate Court in Lee County, Ga., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Nicholas Weaver argued that the WPA-2 flaw should not be concerning to average people. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See also Hart, 717 F.3d at 155 (“‘a Lanham Act false endorsement claim is the federal equivalent of the right of publicity’”, taken from the Tiger Woods right of publicity case, ETW Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved- IPSO mediation 01201-20 Gallagher v Lincs Free Press, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01139-20 Wood v Grimsby Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach- after investigation 09696-19 Hudson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 07463-19 Ward v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by… [read post]