Search for: "Royal v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* Polo not the same as football, but Royal Berks give Yanks a partial whippingJeremy pens of Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related tradebmark dispute involving many, many horses. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:12 pm
Royal 16-7393 Issue: Whether refusal to consider the inflationary impact of obsolete testing norms on IQ scores is contrary to or an unreasonable application of Atkins v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:44 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
United Steel, etc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Royal, 875 F.3d at 907 n.5 (collecting state cases); see also US v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
(See Di Ponzio v Riordan, 89 NY2d 578 [1997]; Basso v Miller, 40NY2d 233 (1976); Jaume v Ry Mgt. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
-Dec. 2022) [full-text]"Deporting with care: Detention in Sweden," Chapter in Deportation Limbo: State Violence and Contestations in the Nordics (Manchester Univ. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm
Too bad for you, dude; from Lindblad v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
WIPO has a big book that tells its top brass how to address diplomats, ambassadors and members of the Royal Family, but there is no formal precedent that deals with the right way to address an email to a fictional cat. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Interveners: The Royal College of Midwives and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service The Supreme Court has allowed interventions by the Royal College of Midwives and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
” At The New Republic, Matt Ford looks at the cert petition in Royal v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:06 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
On Thursday 18 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:57 am
Royal Surplus Lines Ins. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
