Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 3:48 am
United States, 491 U. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
United States Department of Justice U.S. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
v=0MDBIGACxig&t=60s. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded after rejecting both of the District Court's grounds. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in a medical device patent case and found that the defendant had a meritorious patent exhaustion defense. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:39 pm
An example would be a manufacturer who represented that his products were made in the United States by companies that employ only union labor, whereas in fact they were made in Third World sweatshops. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
” Healy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
Sellers, which asks when a federal court in a habeas case should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
However, looking at some of the factors of a sale, it cannot be said that the transaction was a sale 4.1 Going the US way – substance over form approach In the United States, the Courts have normally refused to go by the label of the contract rather than looking into the nature of the agreement. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:43 pm
The Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:36 am
In late June of last year, the Supreme Court ruled in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 6:55 pm
United States. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES April 24, 2008 Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm
Swimming pools pose a risk to children all across the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:35 pm
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. [read post]
