Search for: "Spells v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 3:38 pm by Shahram Miri
In light of this, it is best to just state that the interests are equal or just spell out the number, e.g. 50/50 or 25/25/25/25. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“An Innovative Way to Title Property in Poor Countries” [Ian Vasquez on Peter Schaefer and Clay Schaefer Cato study] Berman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:21 am by Venkat
Defendants initially said that Plaintiff breached its representations regarding paid traffic purchase agreements and the state of the traffic to DYAC. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:39 am by Stephen Z. Starr
Spell (In re Spell),  650 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir. 1981) involved the following issue on appeal: “whether the dischargeability of Spell’s debt to the State should be determined by the law in effect on August 9, 1978, when Spell was discharged in bankruptcy, or by the law in effect on March 4, 1980, when the bankruptcy judge ruled on the Commissioner’s complaint to determine dischargeability of the debt. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:39 am by Stephen Z. Starr
Spell (In re Spell),  650 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir. 1981) involved the following issue on appeal: “whether the dischargeability of Spell’s debt to the State should be determined by the law in effect on August 9, 1978, when Spell was discharged in bankruptcy, or by the law in effect on March 4, 1980, when the bankruptcy judge ruled on the Commissioner’s complaint to determine dischargeability of the debt. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Keith Donoghue
Reckless or grossly negligent conduct is enough to justify suppression, and [United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Thursday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided Viacom v. [read post]