Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2010, 1:21 am
In Purcell v Ireland, the Commission (in an admissibility decision) upheld a reporting ban on Sinn Fein accepting – as with the majority in Holder - apparently somewhat speculative justifications for the ban. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
must be interpreted as meaning that the holder of an intellectual property right over goods sold to a person residing in the territory of a Member State through an online sales website in a non-member country enjoys the protection afforded to that holder by that regulation at the time when those goods enter the territory of that Member State merely by virtue of the acquisition of those goods. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:28 pm
In Moncrieffe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:16 am
On the 4 July 2012 the Supreme Court had a further hearing in the case of O’Brien v Ministry of Justice. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed that copyright holders must consider whether a use of material is fair before sending a takedown notice. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 9:48 am
Two SEP holders have recently been awarded royalties by the High Court that fell far short of their demands (InterDigital v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am
Holder (No. 09-60), that a second or subsequent conviction on a simple drug possession charge is not an “aggravated felony” for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when the state conviction is not based on the fact of a prior conviction. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Per 13A-12-211, any unlawful distribution of a controlled substance of Schedules I through V is considered a Class B felony. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:04 pm
Holder, the court stated that a simple DUI has never been considered a crime of moral turpitude, but an aggravated DUI could be such a crime. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:04 pm
Holder, the court stated that a simple DUI has never been considered a crime of moral turpitude, but an aggravated DUI could be such a crime. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 6:11 pm
Restivo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:34 am
In Richards v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:34 am
In Richards v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
Substantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that another company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
In Pennsylvania v. [read post]
