Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 481 - 500 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
Judgment was handed down in respect of this subsequent hearing on 23 July 2014 in Coventry and others (Respondents) v Lawrence and another (Appellants) (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
Hyatt, in which the Court will consider whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  In holding that “continuous and systematic contacts” alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that a company could be haled into court merely for “doing business” in a state. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument of the Secretary of the State that Parliament by the 2007 Act had taken a policy decision to place the Upper Tribunal wholly beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Walter Olson
Minimum wage laws are sentimental legislation with all-too-real effects [Jeffrey Dorfman] “Our Business’s Response to California $2 Minimum Wage Increase” [Coyote, with more on a union angle on minimum wage laws] Some experience from Europe [Steve Hanke, more, Cato overview of minimum wage debate] Connecticut fires state labor department employee who gamed system to get benefits for friend, then reinstates after grievance [Raising Hale] Oldie but goodie:… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Hall, a 1979 Supreme Court ruling that said a state could be haled into another state’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]