Search for: "State v. Harmon" Results 481 - 500 of 1,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2007, 7:58 am
  Here is the abstract:Through Crawford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:40 pm
In Unocal Corp v Mesa Petroleum Co (493 A. 2d 946, 957 (Del SC, 1985), the Delaware Supreme Court stated that "our corporate law is not static. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Joy Waltemath
” Thus, while “the ADAAA makes it easier to prove a disability, it does not absolve a party from proving one,” stated the court. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm by Deborah Hammonds
For further information, contact Timothy Creagan at (202) 272-0016 (v), (202) 272-0074 (TTY), or visit the Access Board’s website. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:40 pm by Darren
The wording of the Directive and RSA trade mark legislation is very similar.The European approach is designed to interpret a trade mark infringement test that applies across 27 Member States and many more languages and cultures. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[V]irtually all states have adopted the Model Bill and its disparagement provision. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:37 am by John Lewis and Carrie Valdez
Ikuta stated that the majority’s focus on whether the NLRA confers substantive rights was misplaced. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:37 am by John Lewis and Carrie Valdez
Ikuta stated that the majority’s focus on whether the NLRA confers substantive rights was misplaced. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by John W. Arden
Rather than just consenting to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts of Maine, the dealer irrevocably consented and submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of Maine. [read post]