Search for: "State v. Tucker" Results 481 - 500 of 661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2010, 5:29 am by Sam Hasler
In the recent Court of Appeal decision William Hill -v- Tucker [1998] the Court considered that the statement in a training manual that the employer was "prepared to invest in its staff to ensure that they have every opportunity to develop their skills" was incompatible with the concept of garden leave. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
§ 203(c)(1) states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”In, Dimeo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Kathryn Moore analyzes Wednesday’s argument in Culbertson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:24 pm by Lydia Estep
He is co-chair of the firm’s litigation group, supervising several lawyers, and he has served as an attorney for local and national clients in federal and state court litigation and arbitration matters, as well as in bankruptcy proceedings, TTAB disputes (trademark Notice of Opposition and trademark Petition to Cancel proceedings), domain name disputes (ACPA, UDRP, and URS proceedings), government contract bid protests and Tucker Act litigation, and numerous other forums and… [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:04 am by Alison Rowe
Becker's annual Equine Case Law Update--The "case of the year" (the year's most wacky or novel case) was State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
Overview Today, landowners in the state have the right to drain their land with the natural flow of water and discharge excess water into natural watercourses. [read post]