Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 481 - 500 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nelson in 1972 and last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
’” Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
Nelson, Bade, Collins, and Lee) (joined by two senior judges, O'Scannlain and Trott), and Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly mentioned in his opinion that the Ninth Circuit’s decision was rendered over the dissenting views of at least 12 members of that court.The second is United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:07 pm by Jon Sands
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am by Jim Gerl
 Congress has stated that encouraging independent living for people with disabilities is the policy of the United States government. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
The Constitution of the United States has been called the world’s most important legal document. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Jay Willis
” At Newsweek, Krista Gesaman has a preview of Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 755–802 (1993); Larry Catá Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, 6 S. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Council of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Nelson v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Teodoro Toledo and Joseph Tucker claim that the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) breached their rights under a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
A finding that there was a solemnized marriage would require an analysis of religious doctrine, which could offend the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]