Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am
He stated: Seventy-seven years ago, the Soviet Union demanded and received reparations, calling it a moral right of a country that has suffered war and occupation. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm
These petitions to the United States Supreme Court cover a broad range of legal issues related to federal criminal law. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
United States (No. 10-5400). [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:10 pm
United States (No. 10-5400). [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:24 pm
In the meantime, on 30 June 2010 the defendant through his newly retained counsel, AF filed a Criminal Procedure Law 440 motion (1) praying the Court for retroactive application to his case of a recent United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:05 pm
United States – calls into serious question the efficacy of NDAs signed by U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 2:52 am
Or when Neil Young had something to say against President Donald Trump for allegedly disparaging his music during campaign events, without his permission (and this might have affected the reputation of the artist).In the United States, one of the most frequently cited cases, Shostakovich v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
Brunetti.Here's what Thomas writes:Erik BrunettiFreedom of Expression Transcends Morality in US Trademark Registration by Thomas Key As the Court of Justice of the European Union is currently considering the role of freedom of expression in trademark law, the Supreme Court of the United States has made a sharp determination on the matter in Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
Because of an ACLU victory in Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
At this point, restitution efforts transferred to a political and diplomatic level, with members of the Italian Ministry for Cultural and Environmental Heritage and of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs contacting the Getty Museum in 1982, 1989 and 1995, urging the restitution of the bronze on moral and ethical grounds. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
For more than a few years — at least since the United States Supreme Court’s seminal 2017 decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
Insurance Law & Securities D&O Policies Securities and State-Law Suits Exclusions Inadequate Consideration Claim Wisconsin Law Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:30 pm
The moral: govern well, and progressivism will follow. [read post]
