Search for: "WARD v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Toby Mullis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
Annsley Merrelle Ward reports on the new guide with a little help from Merpel.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:16 pm
A case recently decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The case against Monte Ward—Metropolitan Exhibition Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:47 am
The October 30, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Ward v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:58 am
The Court also conclusively overruled Ward v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 6:23 am
In Ward v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
The March cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) are: Pooshs v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:03 am
Robert V. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:25 am
At the New Jersey Eminent Domain Law Blog, attorney Bill Ward of Carlin Ward Attorneys at Law provides an update on an ongoing eminent domain case involving trailer park property on Route 46. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:31 am
The post stated, in part, that Mr. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:22 pm
However, in Burke v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
