Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 481 - 500
of 908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2021, 9:41 am
Supreme Court's "shadow docket" has caught the attention of lawmakers who want to know more about how the justices handle these under-the-radar cases.On Thursday, a House Judiciary subcommittee will hold a hearing on the so-called shadow docket, a name for the cases that don't go through the Supreme Court's normal process of public arguments and signed merits opinions.The shadow docket has drawn increasing scrutiny in the years since constitutional scholar William… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
William Baude, University of Chicago Law School Mr. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:09 am
" At "The Volokh Conspiracy," Will Baude has a post titled "An instance of increased transparency at the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:06 am
Professor Blackman joins an illustrious list of former award winners, including several Conspirators (Randy Barnett, Eugene Volokh, Orin Kerr, Paul Cassell, Eugene Kontorovich, Nita Fahrany, William Baude, and some other guy). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:33 am
Walsh Essays Congressional Insiders and OutsidersAmy Coney Barrett Originalism as a Constraint on JudgesWilliam Baude Scalia in the CasebooksBrian T. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
" Also in the Washington Post (opinion pages): William Baude (Stanford Law School), "Of course the Supreme Court needs to use history. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:48 am
Today the Harvard Law Review has published its issue on the Supreme Court's October 2022 Term, and Will Baude and I have a case comment on Biden v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:02 am
Ilya Somin, Steve Calabresi, Will Baude, and Michael McConnell (and see also Jonathan Adler's post citing Prof. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Thanks to Eugene and the conspiracy for having me here. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
” Coverage comes from the editors at Federal Evidence Review, while commentary comes from Ed Mannino at his eponymous blog and Will Baude at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Yesterday I outlined the three different ways that courts have dealt with the concept of marriage in federal statutes. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Here are a few follow-up questions to my first post this morning. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
” William Baude asked in widely cited 2015 Columbia Law Review article. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
Baude and Stern expressly reject the trespass-property view of the Fourth Amendment (see pages 1834-36 of their article). [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
I am alternately puzzled and exasperated by originalist scholars’ attitude towards eighteenth century history. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 5:56 pm
” Third, Will Baude and Stephen Sachs’s positivist defenses of originalism rely at times on historical claims about what courts do. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:11 am
Rick Garnett suggested recently in this space that it is “obvious” (Rick’s word) that legal entities have Free Exercise rights, and Will Baude has written a bit more cautiously that churches “or the real parties in interest behind them” probably can assert their own first amendment claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am
Will Baude took a shot at an answer a month ago, in his post “How Could Surveillance Violate the First Amendment? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:38 am
Back in 1996, like most people, I was using a 56k baud modem to dial into AOL in order to hook up to the internet. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:03 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So earlier this morning (yesterday, Eastern Time, which apparently governs the Volokh Conspiracy), I explained why the federal government does indeed need to look in large part to state law when it tries to figure out whether a couple is married. [read post]
